Jacob Zuma today has wounded an already fragile ANC. By suggesting that “modern askaris” are behind his downfall, he casts aspersions (and doubts) on a host of current ANC leaders and state apparatchiks, writes Daniel Silke.
Former president Jacob Zuma pressed some
well-worn buttons in his testimony before the Zondo commission on Monday. And,
like a soap opera, it was packed with open-ended innuendos, accusations and a whopping
dose of political intrigue.
Of course, playing the victim was always
going to be Zuma’s trump card. But, the healthy dose of conspiracy theory meted
out by the former president will have left many in the ANC reeling.
Indeed, no-one should ever have expected
Zuma to admit any culpability in the hitherto unproven allegations of state
capture. But in the process, Zuma has ushered in another bout of intense
internal ANC navel-gazing over issues that once again threaten to undermine
party cohesion at a highly fragile moment for President Cyril Ramaphosa.
Other than blaming international agencies
for an orchestrated campaign to besmirch his character (clearly unsuccessful
since he later became president), Zuma effectively laid the blame for his
character assassination at the door of his own party. And, he did this through
the narrative of questioning the genuine struggle credentials of his fellow ANC
In labelling Ngoaka Ramathlodi, a former
mineral resources minister, a spy (rapidly denied by Ramathlodi), Jacob Zuma
was returning to the well-worn habits of old within the ANC – and habits that
were ultimately nurtured by the apartheid police state at the time.
Discrediting opponents within the ANC was
often associated with besmirching an individual as a spy – but since the apartheid
state had largely infiltrated key ANC positions, such allegations were often
Still, the sensitivity within the
liberation movement of their overt and covert linkages to the state security
and intelligence agencies still affords Zuma the chance at a defence of his
position and an ultimate message that he was the genuine freedom fighter unlike
others who were sell-outs. In this way, Zuma claims legitimacy as the “real”
ANC while his detractors are themselves “character assassinated”.
Zuma’s morning defence will have a profound
impact on an already skittish ANC. Racked by internal factions and
multi-pronged fissures, the ANC now finds itself reminded of the days of old.
Worse, though, Zuma’s accusations of how
the “enemy” had recruited ANC insiders – as was done in the apartheid
days – to deliberately remove him from the political scene, will be the most
damaging accusation to the governing party.
Whatever the merits or demerits of Zuma’s
line, such accusations are likely to create further unease and stress in the
ANC. It will add to the political polarisation within the party still evident
following Cyril Ramaphosa’s narrow victory in late 2017.
Zuma’s suggestion that ANC players have
been out to get him in cahoots with foreign agencies can create a sense of deep
internal suspicion where ANC members look at each other with deep feelings of
mistrust and misgivings.
It’s the stuff that can really undermine
unity – not that unity existed in abundance prior to the Zuma utterances.
Clearly Zuma is happy to ferment greater unease
in the ANC. After all, it weakens the fragile grip that Ramaphosa has and also
emboldens his supporters still active at a senior levels across the country.
Zuma is asking South Africa – and more
specifically – the ANC to take sides not only on his character (in the light of
the malfeasance accusations) but more importantly, on whether he represents the
epitome of the genuine struggle cadre in a fight against spies and (as yet
unnamed) Stratcom-esque individuals and agencies.
Put bluntly, Zuma today has wounded an
already fragile ANC. By suggesting that “modern askaris” are behind
his downfall, he casts aspersions (and doubts) on a host of current ANC leaders
and state apparatchiks. Given the extreme sensitivity that Zuma’s strategic
invoking of the past battles into modern ANC politics brings, it’s yet another
headache for embattled Ramaphosa.
While there is still a long week ahead
where Zuma might well flounder under cross-questioning, he did enough today to
present himself not only as the victim, but as the real or genuine
revolutionary. And that might win him some support in the trenches.
– Daniel Silke is director of the Political Futures Consultancy and is a noted keynote speaker and commentator. Views expressed are his own. Follow him on Twitter at @DanielSilke or visit his website.
Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.