OP-ED Opinions 

News24.com | The election is over – now for the tough choices

IEC announces election winners

The IEC announces the winners of the 2019 national and provincial elections. Photo: Deaan Vivier

The next five years could represent a tipping point – one that shifts South Africa back on course to the prospects of development and prosperity, or onto a winding pathway to dysfunction and destitution, writes Terence Corrigan.

With the election now over, South Africa
is looking towards the future and preparing for the coming years. Given the
nature and scale of the challenges into which the country is staring, it’s no
hyperbole to say that the next five years could represent a tipping point – one
that shifts South Africa back on course to the prospects of development and
prosperity, or onto a winding pathway to dysfunction and destitution. 

The central question will be whether the
government – whether under President Ramaphosa or anyone else – is able to get
the economy into gear. This means above all raising the GDP growth rate to a
sustained 5.4% (as envisaged by the National Development Plan), where now
projections are that South Africa will not even touch 3% in the coming years.

Doing so will ultimately demand tackling a
multitude of issues, many of them daunting and intimidating in the extreme.
South Africa is located far from its key markets. Its savings pool is
insufficient, and the rising cost of living (along with government demands)
provides little hope that this will change. The country suffers a debilitating
crime burden. Its mediocre education system, meanwhile, shorts entrepreneurship
and innovation.

More prominent in recent years has been
the near-collapse of many of the country’s state-owned enterprises, and the
consequent threat to the infrastructure they are meant to provide. A murderous disincentive
to business is the inability to guarantee a steady supply of electricity.

And then there is policy, a perennial
issue for investors and entrepreneurs. President Ramaphosa acknowledged this in
his State of the Nation Address in February. “We have addressed these
concerns and we continue to engage those stakeholders who raise concerns about
our policy direction,” he remarked.

Fine words, but their significance is
diluted somewhat by the regularity with which such promises have been made over
the years.

In fact, the country’s policy problems go
beyond mere uncertainty, as bad as that is. Counterproductive policy has caused
grave damage to the country’s economic fortunes. The impact of the current
legislative and regulatory regime in the minerals sector is a case in point.
Once the country’s economic flagship, mining has undergone a steady decline
over the past three decades. Government demands for the ceding of significant
ownership stakes, extensive executive discretion in the administration of the
sector, not to mention a well-founded concern that existing conditions may well
be superseded by something more onerous has done the industry no favours.

The NDP, written in the shadow of South
Africa’s failure to seize the windfall of the commodities boom in the preceding
decade, had this to say: “Yet over the past decade, domestic mining has
failed to match the global growth trend in mineral exports due to poor
infrastructure, alongside regulatory and policy frameworks that hinder
investment.”

Indeed, even allowing for the generally welcomed
accession of Gwede Mantashe to the ministry of mineral resources, these
concerns have by no means fully abated. The implications for the future of
mining are not encouraging.

The new administration takes office to the
echoes of raucous promises to accelerate land reform through expropriation
without compensation. It fails to address any of the real problems in land
reform – administrative incapacity, corruption, indifferent post-settlement
support – and is a real threat to any hopes of an economic renaissance. There
is plenty of evidence that the very discussion of this option has harmed the
country over the past year, along with economic modelling that suggests some
very serious adverse consequences if this is implemented.

Nothing, after all, is quite the
disincentive to investment than a threat to property rights.

Indeed, the drive for expropriation
without compensation shows a dismal inability or unwillingness to learn either from
history or experience. Not only have experiments with expropriation without
compensation invariably ended badly (Venezuela being a prime example today), but
government’s own questionable record on mining policy illustrates the risks.
Back in 2017, when mining was in the hands of highly controversial minister
Mosebenzi Zwane, AngloGold Ashanti executive Ria Sanz phrased the nature of the
problem crisply: “Policy ambiguity strikes at the heart of mining
investment; at the sanctity of ownership. If there is no sanctity of ownership
it makes investment impossible.”

She might very well have been talking
about the looming threat of expropriation without compensation today.

Since policy is a reflection of the
choices that government makes about the direction it wishes to take, there is
an element of farce here. Perhaps nothing is so firmly within government’s
power to alter or to adapt as policy. To refuse to do so is to submit to
avoidable harm.

But perhaps this is seen as an acceptable
price to pay to satisfy an ideological yearning. South Africa would by no means
be the first country to do this (and from time to time, prominent South African
thinkers have spoken of the need to accept hardships in the interests of an
ideologically remade future). Director of the Centre for Development and
Enterprise, Ann Bernstein, recently commented that too many of our
policy-makers evince a strange duality. They are at once pro-growth and
anti-business, hankering after prosperity but undermining the conditions
necessary to achieve it.

There are no guarantees for South Africa’s
future. There is only the hope that its leaders will see the wisdom in
prudence, learn from what has gone before and chart a course for the prosperity
that the country so desperately needs. There is, sadly, little in the recent
past to suggest that this will be the case. For the country’s citizens,
critical choices will be those taken now that the ballots have been cast and
counted. They had best be ready to navigate them.

– Terence
Corrigan is a project manager at the Institute of Race Relations. Readers are
invited to join the IRR by sending an SMS to 32823 (SMSes cost R1, Ts and Cs
apply).

Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24.

Find everything you need to know about the 2019 National and Provincial Government Elections at our News24 Elections site, including the latest news and detailed, interactive maps for how South Africa has voted over the past 3 elections.

Please follow and like us:
error

Related posts

Leave a Comment